A typical criticism of Davis and Moore's theory is that it could lead to which outcome?

• A. Failing students rebel
• B. It eliminates social mobility
• C. It erodes meritocracy
• D. It ignores parental involvement

Answer: (A)

The main idea being tested is that explaining social inequality as functional can still provoke backlash if people feel the system is unfair or unattainable. In the Davis–Moore view, unequal rewards are said to be necessary to motivate the most important work. But critics argue that when students see barriers to success or think effort won’t reliably translate into better outcomes, the justification for inequality can fuel discontent. If many students fail or feel trapped by the system, they may push back—leading to protests or rebellion—rather than accepting the status quo. That potential for social unrest is the reason this outcome is highlighted. The other options describe different critiques, but they don’t capture the direct reactive possibility of resistance or rebellion that arises from perceived unfairness within the system.